Comments on: 1421 : ” The Year China Discovered the World ” (1421航海纪实) http://blog.chinatells.com/2009/07/843 Investor's Portal to China Wed, 25 Jan 2012 07:52:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: 林 http://blog.chinatells.com/2009/07/843/comment-page-1#comment-2953 林 Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:54:05 +0000 http://blog.chinatells.com/?p=843#comment-2953 我有美洲大陆是中华帝国的证据，可是被中国的权威们嗤之以鼻，我很无奈，我将山海经的五臧经画出来了，他们看都不肯看就说成是“巧合”，难道447座山都是巧合吗？我研究出了好多有关“上帝造人”的“证据”，耶和华其实是中国第一个天朝的君主叫天帝，名字是“实惟实”。天帝就是上帝，黄帝就是中帝等，还有大洪水是五千年左右时间为周期的，如今冰山融化已经进入了再次发作的前兆，可是没人相信，没人理我。我的论文两万多字的论证，说明得很清楚。可是在这里没办法发表，请帮帮我。 我有美洲大陆是中华帝国的证据，可是被中国的权威们嗤之以鼻，我很无奈，我将山海经的五臧经画出来了，他们看都不肯看就说成是“巧合”，难道447座山都是巧合吗？我研究出了好多有关“上帝造人”的“证据”，耶和华其实是中国第一个天朝的君主叫天帝，名字是“实惟实”。天帝就是上帝，黄帝就是中帝等，还有大洪水是五千年左右时间为周期的，如今冰山融化已经进入了再次发作的前兆，可是没人相信，没人理我。我的论文两万多字的论证，说明得很清楚。可是在这里没办法发表，请帮帮我。

]]> By: Wushu http://blog.chinatells.com/2009/07/843/comment-page-1#comment-371 Wushu Sat, 12 Sep 2009 05:05:24 +0000 http://blog.chinatells.com/?p=843#comment-371 my feeling is that there are a lot of conjecture and guesstimate in the conclusion of this book. Nevertheless it provides an alternative perspective to understand the impact of Zheng He's Fleet and the history of Ming Dynasty during that time. my feeling is that there are a lot of conjecture and guesstimate in the conclusion of this book. Nevertheless it provides an alternative perspective to understand the impact of Zheng He’s Fleet and the history of Ming Dynasty during that time.

]]> By: Rosie of BooksAndBakes http://blog.chinatells.com/2009/07/843/comment-page-1#comment-363 Rosie of BooksAndBakes Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:55:30 +0000 http://blog.chinatells.com/?p=843#comment-363 多谢这书评 － 我正在看，同意所有中国通应该看这本书！ Thanks for the review - I'm reading this at the moment and agree that any China-crazies should be too! But, having said that, it is subject to criticism, and is accused of being 'reckless'. I don't know the facts, but I am getting that impression. Thus far, no other experts have expressed an opinion in the book, which always makes you wonder. 但是，还被学者受了批评，说它是粗的。我不知道知情，可我对这本书有了哪影响。Menzies不引别的学者，让我不太信。。。 多谢这书评 － 我正在看，同意所有中国通应该看这本书！
Thanks for the review – I’m reading this at the moment and agree that any China-crazies should be too!

But, having said that, it is subject to criticism, and is accused of being ‘reckless’. I don’t know the facts, but I am getting that impression. Thus far, no other experts have expressed an opinion in the book, which always makes you wonder.
但是，还被学者受了批评，说它是粗的。我不知道知情，可我对这本书有了哪影响。Menzies不引别的学者，让我不太信。。。

]]>